Fiore de'i Liberi
Biography
Fiore de'i Liberi (ca. 1350 – ca. 1410s) — Fiore the Friulian of Cividale d'Austria, son of Messer Benedetto, of the house of the Liberi of Premariacco — was an Italian master-at-arms of the late fourteenth century. By his own account he studied the art of arms from his youth under many German and Italian masters, "in many provinces and many cities, at great cost," and practised it for forty years and more.
His preface names his credentials plainly: he trained noble students for judicial combat in the barriers — among them Galeazzo da Mantova, who faced the French marshal Boucicaut at Padua — and he himself fought five duels with sharp swords, in an arming jacket without other armor, against rival fencing masters who challenged him because he refused to teach them. He taught in secret, under oath; he held that no man could keep a quarter of the art in memory without books. The treatise he left, Fior di Battaglia, was composed around 1409 at the request of Niccolò III d'Este, Marquis of Ferrara.
Fiore's art — armizare — is not a single-weapon method but a complete system of personal combat: grappling, dagger, sword in one and two hands, armored combat, poleaxe, spear, and mounted fencing, all governed by one tactical grammar. The evidence for that claim is traced play by play in the tactical groupings.
The Four Animals
Where Fabris frames his system through four guards, Fiore frames his through four virtues, drawn as four animals around the segno — the emblematic figure of a master ringed by seven swords. Whoever would be good in this art, he writes, must have his share of all four.
"Better than I, the lynx, no creature sees; and that which I see I always set by compass and by measure." The deliberative virtue: judgement of distance and moment.
"I, the tiger, am so swift to run and to turn that the bolt from the sky cannot outstrip me." Speed of hand and foot — the tempo of the whole system.
"More than I, the lion, none bears a bold heart; therefore I make invitation to battle to anyone." Boldness in the commitment — the courage to enter.
"I am the elephant, and I carry a castle for a load; and I do not kneel, nor lose my stride." Structural strength and stability — the base under every play.
Remedy, Scholar, Counter
The whole book runs on one pedagogical engine. A crowned Master — the Remedy Master — shows the remedy to a given attack. His scholars, marked by a garter below the knee, perform the plays that flow from that remedy. Then a Counter Master, wearing both crown and garter, shows the counter that defeats the remedy and its scholars. Occasionally a fourth figure, the contra-contrario, reverses the counter — though Fiore warns that "few plays in the art go beyond the Third Master; and if more are made, they are made with danger."
The Manuscripts
Four early manuscripts survive, in two families — a prose recension and a verse recension — plus a seventeenth-century copy of the preface. They transmit one art with real divergences; the full collation is on the manuscript comparison page, and our translations are assessed against the state of the language ca. 1400 in the translation evaluation.
Treatise
Our study covers the complete treatise: 336 plates across thirteen sections, translated from the public-domain manuscript transcriptions (Getty as base text, the verse witnesses translated in full), organized folio by folio with a plain-language flow of actions, a glossological analysis, and a manuscript comparison for every page.
Research sections
Grappling to mounted fencing, folio by folio: image, translation, verse witness, and the flow of actions for every plate.
The Remedy–Scholar–Counter chain, wide vs close play, disarms, locks, and the cross-weapon grammar — the one-art thesis traced with citations.
Guards, blows, crossings, the three locks and three takings, footwork — and what the manuscripts do and do not actually say about them.
Fiore's technical vocabulary as he uses it — not as later masters redefined it — organised by theme.
The load-bearing terms with fuller treatment and example passages cited from the plays.
The five witnesses: coverage, families, orthography, and the places where they contradict each other.
How the translations hold up against the vocabulary and state of the language — the false friends, the morphology, and the honest limits.